We optimize for meetings you can defend.
Not more sends. Not more seats. Meetings that actually happened, backed by evidence.
BuyerPersona, not lookalikes
We model the actual people who buy from you - pains, triggers, disqualifiers, language. Campaigns are created per approved segment.
Most tools find companies that resemble your current customers, or blast broad titles.
Sourced before written
Every factual sentence must cite a real SourcedClaim. The guardrail blocks unsourced claims before they reach approval, and citations are visible to reviewers.
AI writes plausible copy with no requirement to cite sources. You discover the hallucinations after sends.
Copilot by default
Human approval is required before launch, with daily budget caps and a dispatch-time suppression re-check.
Volume-first. Many sequences run on autopilot with minimal or no human review before launch.
Outcome-tied pricing
$79 base includes 500 contacted leads, $0.05 per extra lead, $25 per qualified meeting - capped at 20% of subscription. Verifiable: booked, accepted, time passed, not cancelled.
Seat pricing or send-volume pricing. You pay the same whether meetings happen or not.
Guardrails that actually run
Verification before send, a circuit breaker on bounce and complaint rates, global permanent opt-out, append-only ledgers. These are not features you can turn off.
Compliance is often a policy document, or a setting you can disable to hit volume targets.
How Rainmaker compares, in plain answers.
Only what we have observed first hand in the other tools, dated on their own comparison pages.
How does Rainmaker compare to Gojiberry?
Gojiberry ($99/user flat, YC S26) leads with LinkedIn intent signals and strong onboarding speed. Rainmaker leads with source-verified outreach and copilot approval. Rainmaker cites sources in every email and blocks unsourced claims; Gojiberry sends without citations. Rainmaker defaults to approval-required (copilot); Gojiberry defaults to autopilot. Rainmaker prices on meetings booked; Gojiberry prices on seats. Rainmaker costs $79/mo base vs Gojiberry's $99/user.
How does Rainmaker compare to Explee (AutoGTM)?
Explee (AutoGTM, $0.03/email) has a large proprietary database and natural-language ICP search. Rainmaker builds a BuyerPersona from your URL instead of running similarity searches, which is why Explee's ICP engine has been observed returning competitors as ideal customers. Rainmaker cites sources; Explee does not. Rainmaker requires approval before send; Explee is autopilot-only.
Does Rainmaker use lookalike targeting?
No. Rainmaker identifies prospects by buyer persona fit, not lookalike matching. It scores each company against your ICP and explains the score. Lookalike models surface companies that look like your existing customers, which often includes non-buyers and direct competitors.
What does outcome-tied pricing mean in practice?
Rainmaker charges $25 per qualified meeting in addition to its $79/mo subscription. A qualified meeting is one that is booked, RSVP-accepted by the prospect, and not cancelled before it starts. This fee is capped at 20% of your subscription charges in any month, so the maximum outcome fee on the $79 base plan is $15.80 per month.
See it yourself
Paste any B2B domain into the demo. You will see a BuyerPersona plus illustrative scored leads, and an email passed through the production citation guardrail.
Pricing is public and calculator-driven. We only make more money when you book verifiable meetings.