Rainmaker.
For teams of two to ten reps

Every rep writes outbound their own way

Different research, different openers, different versions of what your product does. The variance is the cost - in quality, and in what gets promised on your behalf.

The same account, three reps
Rep A - cites their funding round, links the announcement.
Rep B - says they're “scaling fast”, source unknown.
Rep C - sends a template with the wrong company name.
You find out about B and C from the prospect, weeks later, on a call you're in.
01

One queue, one standard

Every rep works the same scored queue under the same sourcing rule, so quality stops depending on who happens to be sending.

02

Approval where you want it

Reps approve their own queue, or you approve theirs. Either way nothing unsourced can leave - so you're not the bottleneck for every line.

03

Ramp measured in days

A new rep starts with scored accounts and sourced openers instead of a blank sequence builder and a hope.

What a manager sees

A pipeline review about judgement, not spelling

Every send carries its sources, so you can review the decision a rep made rather than proofreading their grammar.

RepThis weekSourcedBlockedMeetings
Priya R.
32 approved, 2 edited before sending
100%
1
4
Jonas W.
28 approved, 6 rejected as too thin
100%
3
3
New rep, week 1
11 approved with a manager co-sign
100%
2
1

Specimen - illustrative reps and counts, not a customer’s numbers.

Rollout

Start with one rep, not the whole team

Week one: one rep, one segment, manager co-signs every send.
Week two: that rep self-approves; a second joins with co-sign.
Week four: whole team, shared persona, one weekly review of blocks.
Cost, for a team

No per-seat fee, ever

One $79 base for the workspace, 5¢ per contacted lead beyond the first 500, and $25 per qualified meeting capped at 20%. Adding a rep costs nothing - which is the opposite of how seat pricing behaves when you grow.